Valuation of goods under central excise - deduction from price - ...

Court Rules Against Assessee on Six Deductions in Central Excise Goods Valuation Case.

March 10, 2012

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Valuation of goods under central excise - deduction from price - No justification for the Commissioner to decide the claim regarding six deductions by answering the same in favour of the assessee. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation of goods under central excise - deduction from price - ...

Court Rules Against Assessee on Six Deductions in Central Excise Goods Valuation Case.

March 10, 2012

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

Valuation - clearance to sister unit - goods were not fully finished - the valuation could not have been done under Rule 9 of Central Excise Valuation Rules 2000 - AT

Job work - valuation under central excise - Rule 10A(i) or (ii) or Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules will not apply in respect of job worked goods consumed by the principal...

Revocation of Central Excise Registration - very person, who produces or manufactures any excisable goods, shall get registered. Thus, without registration, the...

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

The key legal issues and holdings in this case are: 1. Valuation of clinkers transferred by the appellant to their sister concern should be done u/r 4 read with Rule 11...

Appellate Tribunal's decision in identical matter of assessee for earlier period relied upon to dismiss department's appeal challenging determination of assessable value...

The court held that the revenue authorities cannot question the decision of the Development Commissioner regarding bunching of products for domestic tariff area (DTA)...

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

The CESTAT ruled that the appellant's excisable goods clearance to an inter-connected undertaking should be valued under Rule 10, not Rules 8 & 9 of the Central...

Valuation of goods sold at the depots - the absence of a transaction value from the depot would bring the impugned goods within the ambit of section 4 (1)(b) of Central...

Method of valuation - Applicability of most appropriate rule for valuation - it is not the method of valuation that determines the applicability but that the method...

Valuation - Job-worked goods - governed by Rule 8 of Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000 or on cost construction method i.e. cost of raw material plus job charges? -...

CESTAT ruled that merely listing an inter-connected undertaking in Income Tax Form 3CD does not establish a "related person" relationship under Central Excise law....

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

Quick Updates: