Penalty - courier service -The contention that once there is a ...

Service Tax

March 10, 2012

Penalty - courier service -The contention that once there is a default, the payment of penalty is automatically unsustainable in view of the language employed in Section 80 of the Act - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - courier service -The contention that once there is a ...

Service Tax

March 10, 2012

You may also like:

Transportation of cargo by air - default in payment of service tax - assessee contested against invoking the extended period of limitation - penalties set aside u/s 80 - AT

Default in the payment of Central Excise Duty - Undisputedly appellants have discharged the duty as demanded in the show cause notice and confirmed against them for the...

Once what is received by the service receiver being output services, the same would automatically become input service in terms of Rule 2 (l) of Cenvat Credit Rules - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Short payment of duty due to wrong availment of Excess Cenvat Credit - Payment of duty in Cash - default mentioned under Rule 8(3A) is applicable in short payment of...

Admissibility of Section 7 application - The date of default which is mentioned in the tabular form cannot be ignored it is clear that there was default of more than...

Penalty u/s 76 and 78 of FA - continuous default in paying service tax - statute has provided for cases/situations where there is a possibility of payment of Service Tax....

Penalty levied u/s 221 - default on the part of assessee or deeming the assessee to be an assessee on default - Failure to collect tax u/s 206C while selling timber -...

Penalty - Short payment of service tax - payment prior to issue of show cause notice (SCN) - section 73(3) - penalty set aside - AT

Penalty u/s 271D - default u/s 269SS - assessee has taken loan from his father and paternal aunt, who are family members and such transactions would not attract penalty u/s 271D

Quick Updates: