Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s 80IB - One’s own ...

Income Tax

September 21, 2016

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s 80IB - One’s own mistake or delay can’t be used to advance one’s cause. In law, nobody can claim the benefit of delays or mistakes on his own part; though it may advance the cause of the other side - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s 80IB - One’s own ...

Income Tax

September 21, 2016

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - excess expenses disallowed and suppression of receipts - being bonafide mistake in accounting the total contract receipts, no penalty.

Penalty u/s 271(1) - addition of wrong claim u/s 80IB made by assessee in the return & surrendered during scrutiny proceedings - such claim is solely based on the report...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because, the assessee did not preferred any appeal against the said disallowance does not make it an inadvertent mistake - penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - Penalty has been levied in a mechanical manner without application of mind. In our view, this is a serious mistake in the...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 2(22)(e) - deemed dividend - While levying the penalty, the deeming provisions can be applied to a limited extent and instant...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - deemed income being loss claimed and disallowed - The AO has also not specified the charge on which penalty is being levied - No penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – mere admission of appeal by the High Court is sufficient to debar the penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT upheld penalty - the onus of proving and disproving keeps on shifting as the proceedings are advanced. - AT

Quick Updates: