Demand of differential duty - Valuation - The appellants sells ...

Central Excise

October 8, 2016

Demand of differential duty - Valuation - The appellants sells 98% of his finished goods to outsiders/independent buyers, and only 2% of the finished goods manufactured are sold to the holding company - provisions of rule 9 are not invokable - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demand of differential duty - Valuation - The appellants sells ...

Central Excise

October 8, 2016

You may also like:

Levy of interest on differential duty raised through supplementary invoice - retrospective increase of price of finished goods - demand of interest confirmed - penalty waived - AT

Valuation - inclusion of freight and insurance in the assessable value for the manufactured goods delivered at the buyers premises - place of removal not taken as...

Valuation - Method of valuation - non-inclusion of profit marging in the assessable value of semi-finished goods cleared to their other unit - no demand being revenue...

Conversion to DTA from EOU - The duty demand raised on the semi-finished goods and finished goods cannot be sustained for the reason that the goods have already been...

There was no provisional assessment during the relevant period - the appellants are not required to pay differential duty in cases where goods have been sold at higher...

Demand of duty on differential value - processed fabrics was sold by the ‘job-worker’ to the principal manufacturer who sold them to other buyers - having accepted the...

Amends notification No 25/98-Customs to update the classification of the goods in the notification - Effective rate of customs duty on certain goods

Imposition of personal penalty on two Directors - valuation of goods - In any event, excise is a levy on manufacture and it is found that it is not the case of the...

Captive consumption - excise duty upon molasses - Suppression of value of goods - Demand of differential duty - The burden is upon the proper officer. - HC

Refund claim - Adjustment of differential duty in refund sanctioned - adjudicating authority rightly adjusted the refund claim against the demand of differential duty - AT

Quick Updates: