There cannot be one order of assessment by AO for the same ...

Income Tax

October 22, 2016

There cannot be one order of assessment by AO for the same period for which the Commission would also pass the order of settlement. Accepting the contention that even if the order of assessment has been passed by the AO, his case may still be deemed to be pending since such order was not dispatched or served, would lead to a conflicting situation - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

There cannot be one order of assessment by AO for the same ...

Income Tax

October 22, 2016

You may also like:

Validity of Settlement Commission order u/s 245D(4) - Proof of true and full disclosure of income - While this Court does not accept the contention of the petitioner...

Disallowance of commission paid - excessive expense on commission - the average rate of commission paid by the assessee to others in respect of rice was 20, but rate of...

Adjustment of excess paid service tax from the liability of another period - if the contention of the appellant is accepted that they have paid excess service tax in the...

Addition u/s 68 - Estimation of commission on accommodation entries - Though, it can be accepted that in case of accommodation entry provider only commission can be...

Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - non-compliance of the statutory notices - It is the contention of the assessee that AO through National Faceless Assessment Centre had issued...

Block assessment - The notice u/s 158BC was issued by AO on 5th May, 2000, which was served on 08th May, 2000. The time limit for passing assessment for Block Period was...

TP Adjustment - Impute interest on receivables - LIBOR + 200 basis point rate is most appropriate rate and hence, direct the AO/TPO to adopt LIBOR + 200 basis point for...

Settlement commission power u/s 245D - Commission could have either rejected the application or allowed it to be proceeded further - When a duty is casts on the...

Prior period expenditure - when prior period income is taxed prior period expenditure cannot be disallowed - AT

Penalty u/s 234E - delay in filling of TDS return - Contention of the AR that since the TDS statement pertains to the period i.e for the financial year 2013-14(1st...

Validity of customs notification - anti-dumping duty - sunset review - If the contention of the appellant that the notification has to be issued during the life time of...

Addition of commission expenses and franking charges - Allowable business expenditure or not? - The Tribunal acknowledged that the assessee had provided details of the...

Disallowing commission expenses u/s 37 - As all the persons to whom commission was paid were either Directors of the Company or their relatives. None of them is shown to...

Disallowance of commission u/s 37(1) - AO is directed to ascertain whether the payment of commission is prohibited by law or not - The assessee is directed to prove the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO had come to the conclusion that for want of suppling sufficient material by the assessee, the claim of commission cannot be accepted - No penalty - HC

Quick Updates: