Validity of assessment order - mere fact that the demand notice ...

Assessment Order Validity Intact Despite 2016 Demand Notice; No Presumption of Backdating Justified.

October 27, 2016

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Validity of assessment order - mere fact that the demand notice was sent in the year 2016 will not be enough to raise presumption that the order has been ante-dated. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of assessment order - mere fact that the demand notice ...

Assessment Order Validity Intact Despite 2016 Demand Notice; No Presumption of Backdating Justified.

October 27, 2016

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity of SCN - Time Limitation - it is open for the petitioners to reply to the show cause notices and meet out the allegations contained in the show cause notices,...

NOTICE INVITING COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT COMPANIES (AUDITOR’S REPORT) ORDER, 2016

HC allowed the petition, holding that the respondent's adjustment of refund for AY 2014-15 against the demand for AY 2016-17 was unjustified. The court noted that the...

The CESTAT held that the benefit of Notification No. 21/2016-CUS (ADD) dated 31.05.2016 is not to be provided to the appellant. The invocation of the extended period of...

CESTAT dismissed Revenue's appeal regarding detained Mulberry Raw Silk. The goods were seized in 2016 on grounds that documentation was unavailable with premises...

Ownership of leasehold rights over the subject plot - demand for enhanced land cost was raised much before initiation of CIRP - The tribunal held that the demand for...

Service of original demand notice from the petitioner - Failure on the part of the petitioner to produce the original demand notice, along with the appeal memorandum...

Initiation of CIRP - pre-existence of dispute - There was no dispute existing prior to the first demand notice and only disputes raised prior to the first demand notice...

Assessment order u/s 147 read with Section 144B was challenged on grounds of violation of principles of natural justice as virtual hearing was not granted despite...

Extended period of limitation - Demand based on Form 26AS (TDS Statement) - The Notice in this case was issued on 08.09.2021, demanding service tax for the period...

Stay of demand - condition precedent for the grant of stay of the demand - Out of three Assessment Years, for AY 2012-13, as stated above, the petitioner has made an...

The ITAT Delhi held that interest levied u/s 220(2) on non-payment of FBT demand, adjusted against a refund due, was not justified as no intimation or notice of demand...

U.P. RERA - Refund of the investment made along with interest to allottees under Section 31 of of The Real Estate(Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 and The Uttar...

Initiation of CIRP - the ‘Lease’ in the instant case, is a ‘Financial Lease’ and comes to an irresistible conclusion that there is ‘Financial Debt’ as per section 5(8)...

Constitutional validity - whether the transactions in buying and selling lottery tickets are not liable to Service tax under the provisions of the FA, 1994 as amended by...

Quick Updates: