Disallowance of 5% paddy purchases - once the expenditure has ...

Income Tax

October 27, 2016

Disallowance of 5% paddy purchases - once the expenditure has been accepted as genuine, there is no reason for the A.O. to doubt the same for the purpose of allowing deduction against business income. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Disallowance of 5% paddy purchases - once the expenditure has ...

Income Tax

October 27, 2016

You may also like:

Disallowance of purchases- Only on account of non-filing of the confirmations from the farmers who sold the paddy to the assessee, adhoc disallowance cannot be made - AT

Estimation of income - bogus purchases - case of bogus bills arranged from the entities and diamonds purchased from somewhere else at a lower cost - The ITAT noted the...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - payment in case for purchase of recharge vouchers from Tata Teleservices Limited - payments were genuine - rigors of section 40A(3) / Rule 6DD...

Revision u/s 263 - expenditure on purchased CDs on Jain Religion - AO had carried out detailed enquiries and taken a plausible view and accepted the assessee's treatment...

Ad-hoc deduction allowed at 25% for purchase expenditure, as admittedly corresponding sales against these very purchases have been offered and accepted for tax

Nature of expenditure - forfeiture of advance of ₹ 7 crores - against purchase of property - once the parties to the transaction have accepted the forfeiture and...

Revision u/s 263 - unverified URD purchases - All these transactions are interconnected and linked with each other. If any of the transaction is doubted then...

Estimation of income - Non genuine purchases of diamond - the first appellate authority himself has sustained addition @3% of the non genuine purchases under more or...

Exemption from GST - activity of custom milling of paddy - the claimed benefit of tax exemption, citing reference of Circular No. 51/25/2018-GST dated 31/07/2018 is...

Bogus purchases - oil cakes shown as purchases by the assessee from 33 parties were not genuine transactions -Tribunal was justified in disallowing 25% of the purchase price - HC

Quick Updates: