Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - AO failed to cut the irrelevant portion ...

Penalty Notice Ambiguity: Officer Didn't Specify If Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Was for Inaccurate Income or Concealment.

November 25, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - AO failed to cut the irrelevant portion of the printed Show cause notice - assessee contended that, the said notice is not clear whether it was issued for furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income or concealment of particulars of such income - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - AO failed to cut the irrelevant portion ...

Penalty Notice Ambiguity: Officer Didn't Specify If Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Was for Inaccurate Income or Concealment.

November 25, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As a matter of fact the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act itself was ambiguous as it did not make it clear as to under which...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice u/s 274 - The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for such notices to clearly delineate the charge against the assessee, allowing...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) of the Act to be bad in law as it did not specify which limb of section 271(1)(c)...

The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - ITAT observed that the notice issued by the AO would be bad in law if it did not specify which limb of Section 271(1) (c) the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - the show cause notice u/s 271(1)(c) AO had neither strike out the inappropriate words nor specify the charges against the...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - non specification of charge - AO has miserably failed to specify in the notice issued under section 274 read with...

Quick Updates: