Validity of reopening of assessment - necessary particulars had ...

Income Tax

January 13, 2017

Validity of reopening of assessment - necessary particulars had already been given to the petitioner showing the reasons to believe and there is no reason why this Court should sit in judgment over the same and take a different view in the matter - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of reopening of assessment - necessary particulars had ...

Income Tax

January 13, 2017

You may also like:

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In the instant case the primary facts were already disclosed in the Notes to Accounts filed along with the balance-sheet...

Validity of reopening assessment - unexplained investment - survey u/s 133A - the vague statements giving estimated details without supporting evidence would not help...

Validity of reopening - Validity of notice u/s 148 when scrutiny assessment was made but same was annulled - doctrine of merger is not applicable - reopening of the case...

Whether serving a fresh notice is necessary for the purpose of making an assessment on the body of individuals where an assessment was reopened in the status of...

Reopening of assessment - siphoning of funds - assessee was under a duty to disclose these particulars fully and truly at the time of the original assessment - Notice...

Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the primary facts necessary for assessment are fully and truly disclosed, the AO is not entitled on change of opinion...

Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal emphasized the principle that for reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, the onus is on the...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of reason to believe - during the scrutiny assessment, the case was discussed with the assessee on four dates,...

Reopening of assessment - condition precedent necessary under Section 151(1) not complied - recording of satisfaction - issue of notice after 4 years - the impugned...

Quick Updates: