Valuation - discount given to buyers - The first condition to ...

Central Excise

February 22, 2017

Valuation - discount given to buyers - The first condition to avail the quantity discount that it is known prior to the clearance is fulfilled, the second condition that the same is passed on to the buyers is not fulfilled in the instant case - discount not allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation - discount given to buyers - The first condition to ...

Central Excise

February 22, 2017

You may also like:

Refund - valuation - quantity discount given after clearance of goods from factory to their depot - Rule 7 - Refund allowed - AT

Valuation of imported goods - Transaction Price - Grant of territorial commission/discount cannot be arbitrary/or discriminatory - It does not affect the normal trade...

Valuation - quantity discount - includibility - there is no scope for deducting the value of M.R.P goods which are supplied along with identical goods in the same...

Valuation - inclusion of freight and insurance in the assessable value for the manufactured goods delivered at the buyers premises - place of removal not taken as...

Refund - quantity discount given to their wholesale dealers as an incentive, by way of credit notes - the nature of quantity discount, albeit given post clearances, was...

Valuation - determination of quantity of edible oil - it would not be practical for customs officers to have the dip measurement of the quantity received in refinery in...

There was a clear understanding between the supplier and the buyer to quote a lesser quantity in the bill of Lading and also to give an impression to the Department that...

Quantity discounts given to dealers of Motor Vehicles at the end of the calendar year - incidence of duty refunded to the dealer through credit notes - refun allowed - AT

CENVAT credit - input services or not - GTA - Cenvat Credit on goods transport agency service availed for transport of goods from place of removal to buyer’s premises...

Penalty - Whether the Tribunal is correct in concluding that the petitioner has colluded with the buyers and obtained C forms to avail the concessional rate - held No - HC

Quick Updates: