Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2017 Year 2017 This

The appellant under the bonafide impression did not reverse the ...

Central Excise

February 28, 2017

The appellant under the bonafide impression did not reverse the credit after due intimation of removal of the capital goods to the Dept. In these circumstances, penalty u/s 11AC of CEA,1944 read with Rule 15 of CCR,2004 is not attracted - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Clandestine removal - CENVAT credit Demand - Penalty - shortage of goods - Mere signing of the chart alleging removal of finished goods cannot be treated as clear...

  2. CENVAT Credit - capital goods - appellant is not required to reverse CENVAT Credit taken on the capital goods, which was procured and subsequently re-exported - AT

  3. Reversal of CENVAT Credit - removal of capital goods as such - power plant - Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - The sale of goods or transfer of ownership of the...

  4. Cenvat credit - Job Work - Capital Goods - Although the capital goods could not be returned “as such“ after the usage, in that circumstances also the credit cannot be denied - AT

  5. Removal of Inputs as such – no need to reverse Cenvat credit availed on Input Services

  6. Denial of CENVAT Credit - whether racks are capital goods - Procurement of “racks” for storage of the final products, terry towels, packed in cartons before...

  7. Availment of CENVAT Credit - appellant is not required to reverse Cenvat credit taken on the capital goods, which was procured and subsequently re-exported - AT

  8. CENVAT credit - re-credit taken aver reversal - there is no need of filing of refund claim and in such circumstances the appellant could avail the Cenvat Credit which...

  9. CENVAT Credit - credit reversed earlier - While holding that the appellant could suo-moto take credit in the facts and circumstances of the case, matter remanded back...

  10. Penalty for concealment of income u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act - Claim of capital loss as bad debt - bonafide belief - no penalty - HC

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates