Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2017 Year 2017 This

The appellant under the bonafide impression did not reverse the ...

Central Excise

February 28, 2017

The appellant under the bonafide impression did not reverse the credit after due intimation of removal of the capital goods to the Dept. In these circumstances, penalty u/s 11AC of CEA,1944 read with Rule 15 of CCR,2004 is not attracted - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Removal of Inputs as such – no need to reverse Cenvat credit availed on Input Services

  2. CENVAT Credit - capital goods - appellant is not required to reverse CENVAT Credit taken on the capital goods, which was procured and subsequently re-exported - AT

  3. Removal of Inputs as such - actual cenvat credit availed is to be reversed not the duty on value as 115% of the cost of production - AT

  4. Reversal of CENVAT Credit - removal of capital goods as such - power plant - Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - The sale of goods or transfer of ownership of the...

  5. Refund of CENVAT credit and interest paid due to wrong direction of the audit authorities - appellant allowed to take recredit of the CENVAT credit reversed along with...

  6. Denial of CENVAT Credit - whether racks are capital goods - Procurement of “racks” for storage of the final products, terry towels, packed in cartons before...

  7. Availment of CENVAT Credit - appellant is not required to reverse Cenvat credit taken on the capital goods, which was procured and subsequently re-exported - AT

  8. Removal of capital goods as such to another units - non Reversal of Cenvat Credit - there is a revenue-neutral situation, demand set aside. - AT

  9. Reversal of cenvat credit - clearance of capital goods i.e. old and used forged hammer - not required to reverse if removed after the ten years of its use in his factory...

  10. Reversal of cenvat credit - removal of capital goods after use - the case of the Appellant was covered under the second proviso to Rule 3(5) and not under Rule 3(5A) of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates