Penalty u/s 271D for violating provision of section 269SS - In ...

High Court Rules Penalty u/s 271D Inapplicable Due to Bona Fide Belief in Section 269SS Violation Case.

March 1, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Penalty u/s 271D for violating provision of section 269SS - In view of the bona fide belief of the assessee that the amount could have been received by her from her husband in cash, the penalty proceeding u/s 271D could not have been initiated against the assessee - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271D for violating provision of section 269SS - In ...

High Court Rules Penalty u/s 271D Inapplicable Due to Bona Fide Belief in Section 269SS Violation Case.

March 1, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Assessee sold ancestral agricultural property for cash consideration to relatives, agriculturists. Though agricultural land sale proceeds exempt u/s 2(14), assessee bona...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

The assessee failed to file the original return of income, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings for underreporting income. The assessee's authorized...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Revenue may or may not agree with this understanding of law of the assessee but the fact that there can be a bona fide view to that effect...

Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty...

Penalty u/s 271B was levied on the assessee for failure to get accounts audited despite turnover exceeding prescribed limit u/s 44AB. The Assessing Officer relied solely...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

The case pertains to a delay of two days in filing the Return of Income and Form 10-IC due to technical difficulties on the Income Tax Portal. The Chartered Accountant...

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

Levy of penalty u/s 271D - cash loan received from mother in violation of provision of Section 269SS - bona fide reason - this advance or loan in cash is between blood...

Quick Updates: