Clandestine Removal - in the absence of evidence in the form of ...

Insufficient Evidence in Central Excise Case: Lack of Manufacturing, Electricity Use, Packing, and Transport Details Weakens Charges.

March 2, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine Removal - in the absence of evidence in the form of to Manufacture of such huge quantity, the consumption of electricity, additional packing material payment for purchase of additional packing material, payment received for clandestine removal of goods, how the goods were transported, the charge of clandestine removal cannot sustain - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine Removal - in the absence of evidence in the form of ...

Insufficient Evidence in Central Excise Case: Lack of Manufacturing, Electricity Use, Packing, and Transport Details Weakens Charges.

March 2, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Central Excise demands cannot be sustained solely based on confessional statements without corroborative documentary evidence. Retracted affidavits cannot be relied upon...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

Shearing and back-coating is not amounting to manufacture in Central Excise - SC

Levy and collection of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED), Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC), and Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on removal...

Short payment of Central Excise Duty - The Appellate Tribunal concluded that central excise duty is leviable only on excisable goods manufactured or produced in India,...

Revocation of Central Excise Registration - very person, who produces or manufactures any excisable goods, shall get registered. Thus, without registration, the...

The Central Government rescinded Notification No. 10/2022-Central Excise and Notification No. 11/2022-Central Excise, both dated 30th June 2022, pertaining to the...

The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving contravention of section 9(1)(f)(i) of FERA 1973. The appellant argued lack of material and violation of natural...

The appellant Kaizen Organics Pvt. Ltd. was found guilty of fraudulently availing CENVAT credit and cash refund by showing fictitious manufacturing of excisable goods...

CESTAT adjudicated a case involving clandestine manufacture and removal of goods, finding critical evidentiary deficiencies. The tribunal invalidated electronic evidence...

Recovery of Central Excise Duty alongwith interest and penalty - landowners - As far as dues of the Central Excise are concerned, they were not related to the said plant...

100% EOU - Levy of Central Excise Duty - cotton waste generated in manufacturing of the finished products and cleared in the domestic tariff area - Once it is held that...

Taxable event in case of ‘Central Excise’ and ‘Sales Tax’ is different. While ‘manufacture’ is the event in case of Central Excise; the taxable event in the case of VAT...

The activity of filling imported Hepta Propane/FM-200 gas from bulk containers into smaller empty cylinders does not constitute a manufacturing process under Note 9 to...

Quick Updates: