Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2017 Year 2017 This

Classification of imported goods - if Revenue had a dispute on ...


Revenue Loses Claim of Mis-declaration in Imported Goods Classification; No Evidence of Intent to Evade Duty Found.

March 22, 2017

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Classification of imported goods - if Revenue had a dispute on the said CTH, they could have changed the same when the said Bills of Entry were filed for assessment by the Proper Officer. As there was no change in classification as claim by appellant, now revenue cannot say there was intention to evade CVD by way of mis-declaration- AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Appellate Tribunal addressed multiple issues raised in the appeals concerning the classification of Rubber Processing Oil (RPO), enhancement of its imported value,...

  2. Mis-declaration of goods - import of PLC Splitter Module - Merely because the appellant sought for duty exemption on the belief that the goods imported by him fall...

  3. Classification of imported goods - Mineral Spirits or Diesel Oil-High Speed Diesel (HSD) - Allegation of mis-declaration of goods - smuggling of diesel - none of the...

  4. Mis-classification and misdeclaration of imported goods - goods declared as Lime Mortar(Slaked lime) but goods were found to be in form of ash type powder - The quick...

  5. Classification of imported goods - If every ‘flange’ available in the market could be used in any industry, then perhaps the classification under a single CTH would have...

  6. Valuation of the imported goods - Mis-classification of goods - While the CESTAT upheld the under-valuation allegation, it dropped the demand related to...

  7. CESTAT appellate tribunal determined copper rod import classification dispute. The tribunal upheld classification under CTH 74081190, rejecting CEPA exemption due to...

  8. Appellant's penalties u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 set aside. Reliance solely on co-accused statements without corroborative evidence found...

  9. Classification of imported goods - From the documents it is established that raw material i.e. Petroleum Hydrocarbon Solvent imported by the appellant is their raw...

  10. The case involved the classification of imported consignments u/s CTH 5903 or CTH 5407. CESTAT held that goods were not classifiable u/s CTH 54071094. No...

  11. Mis-classification of imported goods - printed thermal paper rolls - Country of Origin Certificate - benefit of exemption as per N/N. 26/2000-Cus. - It is seen that the...

  12. The case pertains to the classification of imported goods declared as "Spare Parts of E-rickshaw" by the respondent. The lower authority classified the goods under CTH...

  13. Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

  14. Mandatory penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 not imposed - imported goods as “Polyester Bed Sheet”- mis-classified the impugned goods - The case involves a...

  15. Mis-declaration of imported goods - Mobile Point of Sale (MPOS) Devices - appellant and its director have been found grossly mis-declared on the counts of description,...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates