Cenvata Credit - Once the credit of inputs used in exempted ...

Central Excise

March 25, 2017

Cenvata Credit - Once the credit of inputs used in exempted goods stands reversed, the demand for reversal of 8%/10% amount of value of exempted goods in terms of Rule 57 AH or Rule 6 of CCR does not sustain. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Cenvata Credit - Once the credit of inputs used in exempted ...

Central Excise

March 25, 2017

You may also like:

Cenvat Credit - appellants have not reversed the credit taken on inputs/input service used for exempted products - benefit of amended Rule 6 by Section 73 of FA, 2010...

Export of exempted goods - medicaments - credit is available on “inputs used in mfg. of goods exported” even if goods are exempted - credit allowed - AT

Reversal of cenvat credit - It is now a settled proposition that reversal of cenvat credit even after manufacture of the goods and/or clearance thereof amounts to not...

Export of Exempted goods, no need to furnishing bond to claim refund of cenvat credit of input services used in manufacture of exempted goods

The appellant has reversed the credit taken on inputs used in production of goods cleared under end-use exemption notification - rule 6(3) is not applicable to appellant - AT

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - input services - generation of electricity which was captively used but some part thereof was also sold by them/exempt goods - common input -...

Reversal of Input Tax Credit - inputs consumed in dye intermediates (which is also a finished goods), where such goods have been destroyed in fire - - Since the said...

CENVAT Credit – input services - promotional activities - LIC insurance for employees – Prima facie case in favour of assessee - a part of credit stand reversed – Stay granted - AT

Cenvat credit - job work - input services used in the manufacture of job worked goods exempted under Notification No.214/86-CE is admissible. - AT

Refund of CENVAT Credit - export of goods - earlier credit was reversed treating the goods as exempt - appellant is entitled to take the amount in cash - AT

Quick Updates: