Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2017 Year 2017 This

Whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of payment of ...

Central Excise

April 1, 2017

Whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of payment of only 25% of the penalty? - If the assessee wishes to speculate as to the outcome of the further proceedings, he must do so at his own risk - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty - Non deposit of amount of service tax collected from the client - benefit of payment of penalty of 25% extend to the appellant. - AT

  2. Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

  3. Penalty u/s 11AC - Whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of payment of only 25% of the penalty? - The first Proviso not having been complied with, the...

  4. Penalty – The disclosure of duty liability in the return and payment of duty along with interest before the issuance of show cause notices cannot invite penalty under Rule 25 - HC

  5. Waiver of penalty or benefit of reduced penalty @25% - Appellant has shown reasonable cause for non payment of service tax and considering facts that the appellant has...

  6. Default in payment of service tax - Benefit of reduced penalty u/s 78 - the major demand amount already stands paid by them - the Appellant is entitled to pay reduced...

  7. Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

  8. Typewriter is a machinery entitled to depreciation at 25%

  9. Depreciation on dealership network - he same was in the nature of intangible asset as contemplated u/s 32(1)(ii) of the Act - The assessee was entitled to depreciation...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates