Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2017 Year 2017 This

Manufacture - blending of MS/HSD with MFA to make branded MS/HSD ...


Blending Additives with Fuel for Premium Sales Is Not Manufacturing, Demand Set Aside.

April 11, 2017

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Manufacture - blending of MS/HSD with MFA to make branded MS/HSD which sell at a premium only improves the quality of the product, and this process, would not amount to manufacture - demand set aside - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

  2. Valuation - third party inspection charges cannot be included in transaction value - Supreme Court held cost of transportation from place of removal to delivery excluded...

  3. Manufacture - Intermediate products - captive consumption - marketability - The Revenue has sought to demand duty on additive mixture without alleging additive mixture...

  4. Demand for service tax on commission received on vehicle sales, sales promotion, and incentives under 'Business Auxiliary Services' set aside as show cause notice failed...

  5. CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside service tax demands on two grounds. First, the tribunal determined that the supply of DG sets to IOCL constituted a...

  6. This notification amends the Fourth Schedule of the Central Excise Act, 1944, related to mineral products under Chapter 27. It substitutes the Supplementary Notes,...

  7. Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

  8. Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

  9. Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

  10. The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not...

  11. Extended period of limitation – Revenue neutrality - Demand set aside - AT

  12. The CESTAT set aside the demand and penalties imposed on the grounds of alleged clandestine removal, holding that the charge was not substantiated by sufficient evidence....

  13. Classification of imported Vitamin AD3 (1000:200) IU/G (Feed grade/Feed additive) under the Customs Tariff Heading (CTH). The Supreme Court has reiterated that the HSN...

  14. CESTAT held that call center services qualify as input services under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as they contribute to brand building and ultimately lead to...

  15. The CESTAT ruled that Ziking (slag), a by-product emerging during Silico Manganese manufacture, is not subject to excise duty. Following precedents in Monnet Ispat and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates