Business Auxiliary Service - money changers business - the ...

Appellant and TCIL are seller and purchaser, not principal and agent; service tax demand under Business Auxiliary Service dismissed.

May 16, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Business Auxiliary Service - money changers business - the relationship between the appellant and the TCIL is that of seller and purchaser and cannot be termed as principal and agent - demand set aside. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Business Auxiliary Service - money changers business - the ...

Appellant and TCIL are seller and purchaser, not principal and agent; service tax demand under Business Auxiliary Service dismissed.

May 16, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Demand of service tax - Exemption to the principal would be available to the agent also.

The case pertains to the levy of service tax, interest, and penalty on business support services involving revenue sharing between the appellant and diagnostic service...

Levy of service tax - real estate agent - collecting transfer/administrative charges - Referring to precedents, the Tribunal affirmed that charges for changes in...

Levy of Service tax - Business auxiliary service - commission retained/earned towards the service rendered by them to the co-GSA/IATA - The Tribunal finds that the...

Liability to pay service tax for services provided to a foreign entity. The appellant argued that their turnover within the domestic market was below the threshold...

Levy of Service Tax - Business Auxiliary Service - incentives and discount support received by the appellant - It is noticed that the appellant purchases vehicles from...

Demand of service tax - C & F are agent services - mere booking of orders for the principal by an agent on commission basis is not covered under C & F agent services - AT

Refund of Service Tax paid - export of services or not - Business Support Service - The appellant may have rendered the service as an agent of his overseas principals...

The appellant, a customs house agent (CHA), collected reimbursement charges from clients for services availed from various service providers. The department demanded...

The CESTAT held that the appellant did not collect any amount representing service tax from sub-agents/customers. The amount recovered was the service tax already paid...

Classification of services under Business Support Services or not - The Tribunal observed that the appellant merely facilitates and assist the individuals who are...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Once a service is subjected to service tax, the same service cannot be taxed again, as it would amount to double taxation, which is impermissible. In this case, even...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

The appellants are not intermediaries but provide payment processing services to Airbnb, Ireland on a principal-to-principal basis. The conditions for being an...

Quick Updates: