Penalty u/s 45(6) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 - the ...

Gujarat Sales Tax Act: Section 45(6) Penalty is Mandatory, Can Be Imposed Suo-Motu by Revisional Authority.

May 26, 2017

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Penalty u/s 45(6) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 - the penalty u/s 45(6) of the Act is mandatory and therefore, the same can be levied by the revisional authority for the first time in the suo-motu revisional proceedings - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 45(6) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 - the ...

Gujarat Sales Tax Act: Section 45(6) Penalty is Mandatory, Can Be Imposed Suo-Motu by Revisional Authority.

May 26, 2017

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

Suo motu adjustment of excess service tax paid – Rule 6(4A) - stay granted.

Suo moto revision - Eligibility for deduction of the entire sub-contractors' payments made - Both the circumstances must co-exist before the revisional authority can...

Penalty proceedings - Commissioner is not justified in exercising his suo motu powers to interfere with a discretionary order passed by the original authority to impose...

Suo motu revisional power - Levy of sales tax on turnover - As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the facts dealt with in the said decision...

Initiation of revisional proceedings - GVAT - Tribunal has materially erred in considering the legality and validity of the initiation of revisional proceedings, taking...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Appellants engaged in manufacturing dutiable goods and providing exempted trading services failed to maintain separate accounts for input services utilized in both...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

The High Court held that the Revisional Authority did not follow the proper procedure prescribed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act while invoking its revisionary powers. The...

Cenvat credit – suo motu credit on the amount paid by assessee erroneously earlier – suo motu credit availed by the appellant is inadmissible to them - AT

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

Levy of Luxury Tax - concealment of sales - suo-moto power of revision - The two circumstances required to exist for the purpose of invoking the suo-moto revisional...

Revision u/s 264 - penalty u/s 270A imposed - waiver of penalty u/s 270AA - The very fact that the indications were made that the matter fall within (a) and (c),...

Quick Updates: