Search and seizure - Claim of interest under section 132B(4) - ...

Petitioner Challenges Seizure of Rs. 1,60,000; Claims Funds Not Considered Advance Tax Per Section 132B(4).

April 26, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Search and seizure - Claim of interest under section 132B(4) - The petitioner claims that an amount of Rs. 1,60,000 seized from him was neither appropriated nor treated as advance tax - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Search and seizure - Claim of interest under section 132B(4) - ...

Petitioner Challenges Seizure of Rs. 1,60,000; Claims Funds Not Considered Advance Tax Per Section 132B(4).

April 26, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

ITAT upheld partial rejection of books under s.145(3) due to unverifiable self-made cash vouchers, though specific quantification was lacking. Given turnover of...

Imported goods classification disputed - whether silver jewellery freely importable or restricted category under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Court found respondent's...

SC upheld the Tribunal's compensation award in a motor accident death claim, restoring Rs. 58,24,000/- for father and Rs. 93,61,000/- for mother against claimed amounts...

HC ruled on tax settlement scheme interpretation regarding admitted versus disputed tax amounts. Settlement Officer erroneously deducted pre-deposit from disputed amount...

Income Tax: Limit of remuneration to working partners in partnership firms allowed as deduction increased - on first Rs 6,00,000 of book profit or loss, Rs 3,00,000 or...

HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent...

The AT found evidence of hawala transactions through a recovered notebook containing daily business accounts, despite the appellant's retraction. The tribunal...

Provisional attachment of escrow bank account - shares of the petitioner / contractor - Joint Escrow account opened by the Principal - GST Evasion - we lift the...

The High Court considered a case involving smuggling of gold under Sections 135(1)(a) and 135(1)(b) of The Customs Act, 1962. The petitioners were found in possession of...

The Appellate Tribunal held that for determining the holding period of a property or calculating long-term capital gains, the date of allotment of the property is...

Proprietorship concerns lack legal personhood; proprietor deemed necessary party. Proceeds of crime from VAT fraud laundered through multiple entities. Appellant's...

ITAT modified multiple additions in a tax appeal concerning bogus purchases and unexplained money. For contested purchases of Rs. 13,80,63,994, ITAT directed application...

Petitioner sought regular bail in case involving alleged wrongful Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed using fictitious invoices from non-existent/suspicious firms. As per...

Respondent no. 2, an improper officer, substantially conducted investigation, inspection, search, seizure, and recorded statements against the petitioner. Respondent no....

Applicability of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) provisions to a non-resident bank and its CEO. The bank was charged with contravening sections 64(2), 6(4),...

Quick Updates: