Order passed by the Settlement Commission - “conclusive" test ...

Court Clarifies Article 226 Jurisdiction: No Relief for Petitioners Benefiting from Own Wrongdoing in Tax Settlement Cases.

June 7, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Order passed by the Settlement Commission - “conclusive" test theory - This court's jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is both, extraordinary and discretionary. It is equitable as well. It should not be exercised so as to allow a defaulter like the petitioner to derive benefit or take advantage of his own wrong. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Order passed by the Settlement Commission - “conclusive" test ...

Court Clarifies Article 226 Jurisdiction: No Relief for Petitioners Benefiting from Own Wrongdoing in Tax Settlement Cases.

June 7, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The High Court considered the maintainability of a petition involving cheating, misappropriation of funds, and defrauding investors. The Court applied the Doctrine of...

Petitioner challenged the provisional attachment of his bank account u/s 83 of the CGST Act by invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the...

High Court rejected petitioner's writ petition challenging refund rejection order, observing that respondent authority had passed reasoned order after considering...

Validity of order of Settlement Commission - acceptance of additional income disclosed by the assessee - Petitioner/Income Tax authority could not make out any...

Classification dispute over imported goods - whether categorized as freely importable silver jewelry or restricted under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Apex court reiterated...

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed against the order of assessment passed u/s 153A, making additions u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the...

Judicial orders of civil court are not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution; - Jurisdiction under Article 227 is distinct from...

Provisional attachment of cash-credit facility - Section 83 of the CGST Act - In the instant case, it relates to recovery of GST. Subsection 5 of Section 159 clearly...

HC dismissed petitions challenging territorial jurisdiction of Additional Commissioner, Kanpur to adjudicate show cause notices (SCNs) issued by DGGI Ahmedabad under...

Power of the High Court in exercising extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 - assessment of conflicting technical reports - It is well settled that the High...

The petitioner filed appeals against orders under CGST/SGST Acts after a delay of four years. The court held that it cannot normally exercise jurisdiction under Article...

Demand of GST - Validity of the order in FORM GST DRC-07 - The High Court declined to entertain the petition directly, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies...

The High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the reopening of assessment u/s 147, citing the petitioner's delayed compliance with notice u/s 148 and failure to...

The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition challenging an assessment order under the Tax Legislation. The court held that generally, when a...

Territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition under Article 226 (2) of the Constitution of India - even though a part of cause of action arises in this State,...

Quick Updates: