Refund claim - rejection on the ground that at the time of ...

Service Tax

July 11, 2017

Refund claim - rejection on the ground that at the time of export of goods, the appellant was entitled for the benefit of exemption N/N. 17/2008-ST dated 01.04.2008 whereas, they have filed refund claim under the benefit of exemption N/N. 33/08-ST dated 07.12.2008, therefore, the refund claim is not admissible - refund allowed

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - rejection on the ground that at the time of ...

Service Tax

July 11, 2017

You may also like:

Rejection of refund claim on the ground that services exported are not taxable services - Unutilized CENVAT credit filed under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004 - Refund allowed - AT

Rejection of refund claim - CENVAT Credit - export of services under Business Auxiliary Services in respect of the goods located in India - since recipient of services...

Refund of the unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Export of goods - rejection on the ground that the supplier has issued fake invoices - genuineness of the purchase -...

Refund claim - rejection on the ground of time limitation - export of goods - the notification categorically states that the claim for refund “shall” be filed within one...

Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of...

Refund of SAD - rejection on the ground of time limitation - The issue of time limit for filing refund claim was subject matter of litigation before the Hon’ble High...

Refund claim of Terminal Excise Duty (TED) - Supply of manufactured goods to 100% EOU - Deemed export - refund cannot be denied on the ground that appellant is eligible...

Refund of accumulated credit - rejection on the ground that there was no “Physical Export” under Rule 5 - It is undisputed that for the period from January2014 to...

Supply of Goods to SEZ - Rebate claim - Rule 18 - The only lapse of non filing of Bill of Export can not be ground to deny the substantial benefit of rebate claim - CGOVT

100% EOU - Refund claim - Rule 5 of CCR, 2004 - rejection of refund claims merely on the ground of nexus with the manufacture of the product is not legally tenable - AT

Quick Updates: