Unjust enrichment - refund claim - Section 4A of the Central ...

Refund Allowed: Unjust Enrichment Doctrine Doesn't Apply to MRP-Based Goods u/s 4A, Central Excise Act.

August 22, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - Section 4A of the Central Excise Act - whether the doctrine of unjust enrichment is attracted where the appellants have cleared the goods on MRP based assessment, as required under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act? - Held No - Refund allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - Section 4A of the Central ...

Refund Allowed: Unjust Enrichment Doctrine Doesn't Apply to MRP-Based Goods u/s 4A, Central Excise Act.

August 22, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Claim of refund after reduction in MRP post clearance - Valuation - Footwear - Depot as place of removal - MRP based valuation - Section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944 -...

The appellant sought refund of countervailing duty (CVD) paid while importing goods declared as 'Natural gum in raw form' through Bills of Entry filed during 2011-2014....

Refund including cash refund of DEPB/FPS scrips - principles of unjust enrichment - The Tribunal examined the facts surrounding the refund claims and acknowledged the...

Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and stockists after clearance of goods was rejected on grounds of incidence being passed on and lack of...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

Pre deposit made by VODAFONE shall not be subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Refund claim - Principles of unjust enrichment - Imported goods as ''wireless telephone'' - The Tribunal's findings indicated that the appellant had paid duty without...

Quick Updates: