Demand of duty - confiscated goods - option to redeem not ...

Duty Demand on Confiscated Medical Equipment Set Aside; Benefit of Notification No. 64/88 Applied Successfully /88.

September 1, 2017

Case Laws Customs AT

Demand of duty - confiscated goods - option to redeem not exercised by the appellants - Benefit of N/N. 64/88 dated 1.3.1988 - import of various medical equipments - demand and penalty set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demand of duty - confiscated goods - option to redeem not ...

Duty Demand on Confiscated Medical Equipment Set Aside; Benefit of Notification No. 64/88 Applied Successfully /88.

September 1, 2017

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Redemption fine and penalty - import of medical equipment claiming the benefit of Notification 64/88-Cus dated 01/03/1998 - conditions of the notification not fulfilled...

Benefit of Notification No.64/88-Cus - medical equipment imported without payment of duty on the basis of customs duty exemption certificate issued by DGHS - The said...

Import of medical equipments duty free - Since the conditions of exemption notification are not fulfilled by the Appellant the benefit of exemption Notification No...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

Exemption under Notification No.64/88 dated 1.3.1988 - withdrawal of the exemption certificate - Since having questioned the said withdrawal and having withdrawn it...

Import of certain sophisticated machines for the Hospital and installation thereof - In this case, notification was rescinded on 01.03.1994. The authorities are not...

Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not...

Classification of import of UPS - Benefit of exemption - The department observed that the imported Home UPS were actually household inverters used for running home...

The appellant had initially exported Indian tea to Netherlands, which was rejected and recalled to India. Upon re-importation, no DEPB claim was advanced. The goods were...

Imported broom sticks (140-160 cm) classifiable under CTH 96031000 not 14049090. Entitled to exemption benefits under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus and 2/2017-ITR. Demand...

Valuation - third party inspection charges cannot be included in transaction value - Supreme Court held cost of transportation from place of removal to delivery excluded...

Duty demand of Rs.15,19,610/- confirmed. Original demand of Rs.2,54,01,776/- not accepted. Appellant failed to counter Commissioner's observations on Annexures II, III,...

Quick Updates: