Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2017 Year 2017 This

If the unaccounted expenditure so incurred was from the 'on ...


Court Rules No Addition u/s 69C for Expenditure Explained by 'On Money'; Only 'On Money' Taxable.

September 14, 2017

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

If the unaccounted expenditure so incurred was from the 'on money' received by the assessee, then, the question of making any addition under Section 69C does not arise because the source of the expenditure is duly explained. It is only the 'on money' which can be considered for the purpose of taxation. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 69C – addition on the ground that assessee deducted TDS on higher value and issued TDS certificate for higher amount - assessee explained the reasons - no...

  2. Addition made u/s 69C - Unexplained huge expenditure to earn Agriculture income - once the assessee has not made any investment, the addition made u/s 69C of the Act is illegal.

  3. Addition u/s 69C - CIT(A) deleted the addition - in order to invoke the provisions of sec. 69C, should give a categorical finding that the assessee has incurred any...

  4. The HC ruled against the approach of estimating profit (at 12.5%) on bogus purchases, finding it contradictory to Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. The court reasoned...

  5. Addition u/s 69A - ambit of the word "owner" and "valuable article" for the purpose of additions as Unexplained money, etc - Apex court explained the scope in a detailed...

  6. Addition u/s 69C OR 68 - Addition of share application money - Wrong mention of section - opening balance was carried forward - it is outside the ambit of section 68 - No addition.

  7. Addition u/s.69C - unexplained expenditure - Admittedly, in the first round of proceedings, there was no addition made u/s. 69C by the revenue. AO could not have made...

  8. The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

  9. Additions based on Cash Expenditure - Disclosure were made by the appellant in IDS - The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the entries did not...

  10. When the same amount has been surrendered and taxed in the hands of donor then the source of the funds which were used for expenditure as to held as explained in the...

  11. Addition u/s 69C - writing off the goodwill has not resulted in the siphoning of funds of the company - Further addition made u/s 69C is also not correct as section 69C...

  12. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions u/ss 69C and 68 for undisclosed credit card expenditures in foreign currencies based on material found during a survey. The...

  13. Valuation - Cable Operator’s Services - Appellant cannot exclude the amounts received for maintenance charges from taxable value in view the Sub-Rule 1 of Rule 5 of...

  14. Jurisdictional issue regarding notice u/s 143(2) was addressed, with ITAT holding that the initial notice by ACIT, Circle-5(1), Delhi was within time, and subsequent...

  15. Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - The High Court found that the Assessing Officer's reliance on cumulative figures provided by CBIC, without specifying the individual...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates