Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2017 Year 2017 This

Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to ...

Customs

September 19, 2017

Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act - vicarious liability of appellant / Pre-Shipment Inspection Agency - Nothing has been brought on record as to show, how due...

  2. Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 112(a) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act 1962 - misdeclared goods - Abetting in illegal imports - The appellant has this certainly rendered...

  3. Imposition of penalty u/s 114AA on Importer and u/s 112 (a) on CHA - the importer took the risk and moved the goods out of the LCS on his own, without listening the...

  4. Penalty on CHA - There was a serious lapse on part of the CHA in verifying the KYC before taking up the Custom clearance of consignment of rough diamond - levy of...

  5. Imposition of penalties on CHA / CB - Any dereliction/lack of due diligence since has caused the Exchequer loss in terms of evasion of Customs Duty, the original...

  6. Income–tax (15th Amendment) Rules, 2016 - Amendments in Due diligence requirement - Notification

  7. Imposition of penalties u/s 112 (b) and 114AA On CHA - there is no element of mens rea or conscious knowledge which can be attributed to the CHA - CHA acted bona fide...

  8. Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

  9. CHA - Some inadvertence or lack of efficiency took place on part of the CHA and that is because of a regular dealing with the said importers and not because of gross...

  10. Penalty u/s 112 - since penalty has been imposed on partnership firm under Section 112 (a), separate penalty on its partner would not be justified - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates