Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2017 Year 2017 This

Revision u/s 264 in favor assesse - non furnishing books of ...


High Court Upholds CIT's Rejection of Revision Request Due to Lack of Documentation u/s 264.

November 9, 2017

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Revision u/s 264 in favor assesse - non furnishing books of account and other relevant material - CIT rightly concurred with the view taken by the Assessing Officer and rejected the petition filed by the petitioner u/s 264 - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Section 264 revision application concerning long-term capital gain (LTCG) on extinguishment of shares due to loss arising from NCLT order. Petitioner's claim for loss on...

  2. Revision petition u/s 264 by assessee - Claiming to act as a collection agent for borewell digging payments, the petitioner argued that the income was exaggerated and...

  3. Revision of other orders u/s 264 - petitioners sought to expressly withdraw the revision petition filed u/s 264 - application was pending for decision - Thus by not...

  4. Maintainability of wrt petition before HC where option for filing Revision u/s 264 is available - Rejection of Refund of excess amount paid as tax - There are no...

  5. Revision u/s 264 - Period of limitation - an order under Section 264 is required to be passed within a period of one year from the end of Financial Year, in which, the...

  6. Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because it was not accompanied by the requisite fee of Rs.500/- An opportunity should be given to cure the same - HC

  7. Revision application u/s 264 was initially rejected due to non-payment of mandatory fee of Rs. 500. However, the petitioner paid the fee immediately upon objection...

  8. Revision u/s 264 - seeking direction to re-consider the claim of the petitioner for deduction u/s 80-IA - there is no limitation on the power of the Pr. CCIT, CCIT, CIT...

  9. Revision u/s 264 - Claiming benefit of DTAA - refund of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) which was paid wrongly - This was not a case where a deduction was made u/s 195...

  10. Revision u/s 264 - computation of income from capital gains - Although, there is a detailed discussion with regard to the nature of the transaction, as to whether it is...

  11. Rejection application for Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Rejection on the ground the assessee has filing an appeal u/s 246 which was rejected by the CIT(A) due...

  12. Revision u/s 264 - Scope of revision under section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be abused as a substitute to get over an order of assessment passed second...

  13. Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Commissioner has rejected the revision petition u/s 264 on the ground of that the Petitioner did not comply with the mandatory...

  14. Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - an order/ intimation passed u/s 143(1) passed by the AO is equally an order, which can be questioned and be made subject matter...

  15. The High Court considered a Revision u/s 264 where the CIT rejected the application due to delay, stating u/s 143(1) intimation was not revisable. The court declined to...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates