Telephone services - retention of part of deposit made - the ...

Court Rules Against Retaining Deposit for Capital Expenditure in Telephone Services Case; Demand Set Aside.

November 10, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Telephone services - retention of part of deposit made - the retention of the portion of deposit towards capital expenditure incurred and not for provision of telephone service - demand set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Telephone services - retention of part of deposit made - the ...

Court Rules Against Retaining Deposit for Capital Expenditure in Telephone Services Case; Demand Set Aside.

November 10, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Export of services or not - Reversal of Credit - The fundamental charge that the service recipients are ‘other establishments’ of service providers in terms of in terms...

Scope of Deposits - amounts collected by the petitioners for sale of immovable property as advance - would come under the purview of ‘deposits’ or would exempt from the...

The High Court's judgment addressed the interpretation of Section 43A regarding losses arising from exchange rate fluctuations on foreign currency loans utilized for...

Royalty payments treated as revenue expenditure, deductible in full; capital expenditure treatment rejected. Bad debt deduction allowed u/s 28, following Supreme Court...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

The case involved determining whether services provided to overseas clients constituted export of services u/s Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal held that services falling...

Valuation - Cable Operator’s Services - Appellant cannot exclude the amounts received for maintenance charges from taxable value in view the Sub-Rule 1 of Rule 5 of...

HC ruled on multiple expenditure deduction claims by a coal mining entity. The court largely upheld the Tribunal's decision, allowing deductions for education, community...

The CESTAT allowed the appeal concerning advisory services provided by appellant to JCB UK, determining these constituted export of services under Rule 6A of Service Tax...

Refund of services tax - input services received by the unit of the appellant established in SEZ - refund rejected for alleged non-compliance of several conditions - The...

The High Court addressed a case involving a delay in filing an application for Revocation of cancellation of GST registration. The court considered the invocation of the...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - capital goods cleared as scrap - The appellant, being an output service provider, was not required to pay any amount in terms of rule 3(5A)...

Forfeiture of the earnest money deposit by the appellant bank - The Supreme Court held that, the underlying principle envisaged u/s(s) 73 & 74 of the Indian Contract...

Capital expenditure or revenue expenditure - the expenditure incurred in regaining this profit company unit is in the nature of a capital expenditure and not the revenue...

Quick Updates: