Refund claim - Once, tax was paid by service provider and later ...

State Must Refund Double Tax Payment Due to Unjust Enrichment Doctrine Violation.

November 10, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Refund claim - Once, tax was paid by service provider and later by the service recipient. State has been doubly benefited. - The doctrine of unjust enrichment equally applies to the State. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - Once, tax was paid by service provider and later ...

State Must Refund Double Tax Payment Due to Unjust Enrichment Doctrine Violation.

November 10, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the order of original authority rejecting the refund claim on the ground of unjust...

Pre deposit made by VODAFONE shall not be subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Refund of service tax deposited under mistake of law - doctrine of unjust enrichment - it is held that under the facts and circumstances as the appellant have deposited...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Denial of refund claim - unjust enrichment - There is no provision in the Central Excise law that the state government authorities would be are outside of the principles...

Refund of Service Tax paid - unjust enrichment - any amount deposited during the pendency of adjudication or investigation is in the nature of a deposit and, therefore,...

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Refund - Unjust enrichment - GTA services - tax was paid at the rate of 12.36% instead of correct prevailing rate of 10.30% - service tax is a part of the freight and...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excess payment of duty due to valuation dispute - in terms of legally enforceable Agreement of the appellant with HLL, the loan amount, was...

Refund of Service Tax - Club or Association Service - principles of Unjust Enrichment - The fact that the appellant has passed on the tax element to its service...

Quick Updates: