Jurisdiction - power of AO to pass order after almost 11 years ...

Court Rules on AO's Jurisdiction: Tax Assessment Order Exceeded 5-Year Limit, Invalidated 10% CST Tax Imposition.

December 14, 2017

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Jurisdiction - power of AO to pass order after almost 11 years from the end of the year which is beyond the period of limitation - imposition of the additional tax @ 10% for non-submission of Form 'C' for CST sales - When a statute mandates re-assessment to be done, within five years, it cannot be contended that assessment can be done at any time - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction - power of AO to pass order after almost 11 years ...

Court Rules on AO's Jurisdiction: Tax Assessment Order Exceeded 5-Year Limit, Invalidated 10% CST Tax Imposition.

December 14, 2017

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

HC held that the eviction notice under Section 8(4) of PMLA is valid and within jurisdiction. The court found that non-compliance with Rule 5(1) does not vitiate the...

The High Court ruled on the constitutional validity of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, which was challenged as being ultra vires...

Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67...

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

HC determined that Notification No. 54/2018-Central Tax amending Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules operates prospectively from October 9, 2018, not retrospectively from October...

The High Court held that the impugned notices issued for Assessment Years 2009-10 to 2014-15 u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act were valid and not time-barred. The court...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Income tax slabs - Upto 2 lacs = nil, from 2 lacs to 5 lacs = 10%, from 5 lacs to 10 lacs = 20%, above 10 lacs = 30%

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

CENVAT credit - Rule 6 - Even if sub-rule (3) prescribes a limit of 20% for availment of service tax credit, sub-rule (5) provides for whole of the service tax credit in...

Constitutional Validity - West Bengal Excise (Change in Management) Rules, 2009 - Changes in the Board of Directors - The inevitable conclusion must be that clause (d)...

Denial of refund claim - Bar of limitation - Whether the time limit of one year has provided under Section 11B is applicable for refund under Rule 5 - Held Yes - time...

Eligibility to claim refund of IGST - The availing exemption under Notification No.79/2017-Cus dated 13.10.2017 in respect of additional duty of Customs under...

The High Court interpreted the phrase "where it is possible to do so" u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ruling that it allows flexibility only in exceptional...

The case involved the scope of limited scrutiny and the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny to...

Quick Updates: