Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2018 Year 2018 This

Clandestine removal - pen drives recovered from the premises of ...


Insufficient Evidence: Demand Set Aside Due to Lack of Direct Proof in Pen Drive Case Involving Trader's Premises.

April 4, 2018

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Clandestine removal - pen drives recovered from the premises of an independent trader - the documents recovered from the premises of the third parties are required to be dealt with, with a caution and requires further corroboration in the shape of the evidences directly related to the manufacturing units in question - demand set aside - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

  2. Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

  3. Central Excise demands cannot be sustained solely based on confessional statements without corroborative documentary evidence. Retracted affidavits cannot be relied upon...

  4. CESTAT adjudicated a case involving clandestine manufacture and removal of goods, finding critical evidentiary deficiencies. The tribunal invalidated electronic evidence...

  5. Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

  6. Clandestine manufacture and removal - plastic molded chairs - burden of proof to establish that there was clandestine manufacture - seizure of the pen drive -...

  7. Clandestine removal - data on pen drive and statements recorded during investigation - The department has miserably failed to substantiate the allegation of clandestine...

  8. Valuation of imported goods - the EXCEL sheets in the pen drive as well as the invoices recovered during the searches - Section 65B of the Evidence Act - There is...

  9. The CESTAT set aside the demand and penalties imposed on the grounds of alleged clandestine removal, holding that the charge was not substantiated by sufficient evidence....

  10. Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

  11. ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings regarding alleged undisclosed "on-money" payments to builder for residential property. AO's reliance on pen drive and documents...

  12. CESTAT set aside multiple duty demands totaling over Rs. 2.3 crores against appellant manufacturer of LABSA. Primary allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal...

  13. Valuation - third party inspection charges cannot be included in transaction value - Supreme Court held cost of transportation from place of removal to delivery excluded...

  14. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving contravention of section 9(1)(f)(i) of FERA 1973. The appellant argued lack of material and violation of natural...

  15. Undervaluation of imported goods - Patchouli Oil - The CESTAT found that the rejection of the declared value lacked legal basis and was unsupported by evidence. The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates