Recovery of Cenvat credit - goods seized and confiscated are ...

Penalty Removed for Seized Imported Goods; Rules 25/26 of Central Excise Rules Not Applicable to Cenvat Credit Recovery.

May 30, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Recovery of Cenvat credit - goods seized and confiscated are imported goods thus the provision of the Rules 25/26 of CER not applicable to the sized imported consignment - Penalty removed

View Source

← Previous Next →

Recovery of Cenvat credit - goods seized and confiscated are ...

Penalty Removed for Seized Imported Goods; Rules 25/26 of Central Excise Rules Not Applicable to Cenvat Credit Recovery.

May 30, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Clandestine removal of excisable goods - Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on Managing Director. Appellant challenged Order upholding penalty without...

Levy of penalty under Rule 25 cannot be imposed upon the main appellant for goods not manufactured by him - however penalty on director under Rule 26 confirmed - AT

Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error...

Levy of penalty u/r 26 - Personal penalty for abatement in evasion of duty - a plain reading of Rule 26 indicates that imposition of the penalty therein is not tied to a...

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

Penatly - default in payment of duty - provisions of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - penalty under Rule 27 only can be imposed - no penalty under Rule 25...

Levy of penalty in the absence of confiscation - penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 even in case where there is no proposal for confiscation can be...

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus Cenvatable invoices issued - the appellant was liable to pay penalty - AT

Levy of penalty under Rule 25 of CER, 2002 – issuing invoices without accompanying the goods - appellant not dealt with the excisable goods at all. The penalties on the...

Imposition of penalty on partners - penalty on partner is not imposable when the firm is penalised under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Rule 11 of the central Excise Rules read with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules,2002 - TThe reason that the goods were not available to confiscation should not be a...

Quick Updates: