Additions towards difference in SPF [Special Privilege Fee] paid ...

Reassessment Based on Special Privilege Fee Difference Invalid; Retrospective Government Orders Determine Correct Fee.

July 5, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Additions towards difference in SPF [Special Privilege Fee] paid and admissible - the subsequent Government orders will have to be taken into consideration for arriving at the SPF payable for the said year - to be applicable with retrospective effect - Reopening of assessment is not valid.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Additions towards difference in SPF [Special Privilege Fee] paid ...

Reassessment Based on Special Privilege Fee Difference Invalid; Retrospective Government Orders Determine Correct Fee.

July 5, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Fee payable to CA Firms, for Special Audits directed u/s 142(2A) - CA Firm registered as MSME - Recovery of fees due from the Income Tax Department invoking the...

Disallowance of expenditure - Payment of Privilege fees - Nature of expenditure - Exclusive privilege for wholesale trade of Indian made Foreign Liquor & Beer - claim allowed - AT

Disallowance of Privilege fee paid u/s 40(a)(ii) or (iib) - sharing of revenue with the state - The privilege fee payable by the petitioner to the State Government would...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 or assessment u/s 153C - reassessment was made based on the materials found in the course of search conducted on third party - The...

The High Court examined the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, considering the sanction requirement u/s 151 and the impact of the...

The 2003 Policy of the Punjab Government granted exemption from payment of Market fee under Clause (i) of 11.4.2, but did not specifically exempt Rural Development fee....

HC held that the AO's reassessment notice under Section 147 was invalid. The AO mechanically recorded reasons based on third-party information without providing...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Value Added Tax paid by assessee and claimed as deduction u/s.37 r.w.s. 43B or u/s 40(a)(iib) - scope of amended provisions of section...

The HC ruled that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires proper justification and adherence to natural justice principles. Following Riddhi Siddhi...

The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the...

The case before the Allahabad High Court involved the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by the assessing authority based on information that the purchaser...

Classification of services - Fee from parks - Market fee-daily - Market fee-weekly - Fees for bays in bus stand (bus stand entrance fee collection) - Bus -stand...

The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe the difference between total cash sales and cash sales reflected in books. Held: Reopening was made only...

Special audit u/s 142(2A) - in the absence of pre-decisional hearing, the decision to have special audit was invalid and consequentially, all the proceedings conducted...

Quick Updates: