Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - ITAT deleted the penalty - ...

ITAT Confirms Deletion of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Unexplained Waived Amount in Bank Settlement.

August 27, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - ITAT deleted the penalty - Additions u/s 41(1) - one time settlement with the SBI - Bank has waived a sum including interest - assessee has not furnished bifurcation of principal and interest amount in the total amount waived off by the bank - Penalty deleted by ITAT got confirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - ITAT deleted the penalty - ...

ITAT Confirms Deletion of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Unexplained Waived Amount in Bank Settlement.

August 27, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - One has to see whether the attitude of the assessee in obtaining only the bills and not the materials/goods would amount to concealment of...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of the notice issued under Section 142(1) - if the assessee really had no connection with the Swiss Bank accounts,...

ITAT reversed AO's additions under s.68 for unexplained bank deposits, finding that while deposits were added as unexplained income, corresponding withdrawals from the...

The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Quick Updates: