Penalty u/section 272A(1)(c) - non-compliance to provisions of ...

Income Tax

September 10, 2018

Penalty u/section 272A(1)(c) - non-compliance to provisions of section 131(1) - failure to submit information - The conduct of the assessee in the instant case is not at all bona-fide - levy of penalty confirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/section 272A(1)(c) - non-compliance to provisions of ...

Income Tax

September 10, 2018

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(c) - failure to comply with summons u/s 131(1A) - no reasonable cause for non-compliance to the notice issued u/s 133(6) - in absence of any...

Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - The bonafide or other wise malafide of non compliance is also required to be kept in mind. The tax and interest are statutory levies,...

Penalty u/s. 272A(1)(d) - non compliance to notice u/s. 142(1) due to covid pandemic - addition u/s. 68 - As it is observed that when there is a reasonable cause for the...

Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(C) - Failure to comply to the summon issued u/s 131(1) - AO has rightly acted as per the provision of sub-Section 3 of Section 272A of the...

Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - non compliance to notices u/s 142(1) - The provisions of Section 272A(1)(d) is of deterrent in nature and not for earning revenue. The remedy...

Penalty u/s 272A (2) (k) - assessee has failed to submit the quarterly TDS statements in Form No. 26Q - The reasonable cause of ignorance of technical knowledge lack of...

Penalty u/s 272A(1)(C) - wilful noncompliance to the summons u/s 131 - it is the ITO/AO who has the power to pass the penalty order and not the Add. CIT. Therefore, we...

Bank failed to furnish declaration in Form 15H to the Dept. in time for non-deduction of TDS, default being of a technical nature, no penalty u/s 272A (2) (f)

Penalty order u/s 272A(1)(d) - No co-operation from assessee's side - To the mind of this Bench, ‘non-cooperative attitude’ as such in itself cannot be the basis of...

Penalty u/s 271B - Failure to get its accounts audited or submitted before due date - contention that the accountant was on leave during the relevat period - penalty confirmed - HC

Quick Updates: