Rebate Claim - on the same date there were two notifications one ...

Central Excise

October 24, 2018

Rebate Claim - on the same date there were two notifications one of which prescribed nil rate of duty and the other prescribed 4% duty - The appellant can opt for a notification which is beneficial to him - Thus, the denial of credit is without any basis and unjustified.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rebate Claim - on the same date there were two notifications one ...

Central Excise

October 24, 2018

You may also like:

Rebate claim - effective rate of Central Excise duty was reduced from 10% to 8% - rebate is admissible of duty paid at effective rate of duty on 24-2-2009 i.e. @ 8% - CGOVT

Denial of rebate claim - export of exempted goods - non-observance of the conditions prescribed in the notifications mentioned above, would result in denial of the rebate - AT

Export duty on Iron ore pellets reduced to Nil rate from 5% - Seeks to further amend notification No 27/2011-Customs dated 1.03.2011 - Notification

Seeks to prescribe rates of Special Additional Excise Duty for exports of petrol and diesel - Notification

Refund claim in respect of excess paid duty - proceeding of rebate and proceeding of refund are two different proceedings - appellant have rightly claimed the refund of...

Amends Notification No. 12/2012-Central Excise, dated the 17th March, 2012 - Prescribes effective rate of duty on goods falling under chapter 1 to 96 - Notification

Amends Notification No. 12/2012-Customs, dated the 17th March, 2012 - Prescribes effective rate of duty on import of goods - Notification

Seeks to amend Notification 12/2012-Customs - Prescribes effective rate of duty on import of goods. - Notification

Amends notification no. 12/2012-Central Excise - Prescribes effective rate of duty on goods falling under chapter 1 to 96. - Notification

Amends Notification 12/2012 – Customs - Prescribes effective rate of duty on import of goods. - Notification

Quick Updates: