Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2018 Year 2018 This

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Minor differences in estimation ...

Income Tax

November 10, 2018

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Minor differences in estimation and consequent valuation are but natural and so long as fundamental methodology so adopted by the valuation officer are not disputed, such minor differences in valuation cannot form the basis for levy of penalty

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - surrender was not voluntary - assessee failed to explain the difference between the assessed income and returned income - penalty confirmed - AT

  3. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

  4. Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - estimation of disallowance at 50% of commission and improvement expenditure - in this case, the additions were made on the basis of...

  5. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – mere admission of appeal by the High Court is sufficient to debar the penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act - AT

  6. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - deemed income being loss claimed and disallowed - The AO has also not specified the charge on which penalty is being levied - No penalty - AT

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act - difference of opinion with regard to the nature of expenditure would not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - AT

  8. Levy of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), does not amount to concealment of income - No penalty.

  9. MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) imposed on minor - The tribunal upheld the appellant's argument regarding being a minor, stating that penalty proceedings initiated against a minor...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates