Justification of power of CIT(A) in restoring the matter back to ...

High Court Affirms CIT(A)'s Power to Return Cases to AO Post-Amendment of Section 251(1)(a) as Authorized.

July 7, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Justification of power of CIT(A) in restoring the matter back to the file of AO - Even if the appeal had been filed after amendment to section 251(1)(a) the order as passed by the CIT(A) directing the AO to decide the matter in accordance with the directions of the ITAT cannot be said to be unauthorized - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Justification of power of CIT(A) in restoring the matter back to ...

High Court Affirms CIT(A)'s Power to Return Cases to AO Post-Amendment of Section 251(1)(a) as Authorized.

July 7, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The preliminary assessment u/s 143(1) is limited to processing the return for arithmetical errors, incorrect expense claims, verifying audit reports, deductions, and...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 - additional income declared in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A as compared to original returned filed u/s...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Adjustment u/s 143(1) disallowing revenue expenditure claim u/s 11(1) was made without providing reasonable opportunity to assessee, violating second Proviso of Section...

Late payments towards EPF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) - Contribution made prior to filing of the return of income u/s. 139(1) - Addition by way of adjustment while...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Rejection of rectification petition - turnover of the petitioner was erroneously reported in the GSTR 1 return - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's claim...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - If AO accepted the revised return, there was no question of making inadmissible claim of deduction u/s 10B in such revised return. In fact,...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

When the AO rejects the revised return then the whole return is invalid. In case AO makes addition from the revised return then it means that he recognizes the revised...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - survey u/s 133A was carried out much prior of date of filing of return u/s 139(1) - amount admitted in survey has offered in return - When the...

Assessment after re-organization of Business - amalgamation or demerger or merger - To remove the difficulty of filling of return by successor it has been proposed to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) under Explanation 5A - no return u/s 139(1) - return filed u/s 153A disclosing Capital Gain which was accepted - it is neither a case of bonafide...

Quick Updates: