Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because an addition is made by ...

Income Tax

January 16, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because an addition is made by disbelieving her capacity to lend the loan.Such a fact, ipso facto, does not lead to the levy of penalty.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because an addition is made by ...

Income Tax

January 16, 2019

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition made on protected assessment - addition in this case was made on protected assessment/addition on estimated basis which is against the law - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because, the assessee did not preferred any appeal against the said disallowance does not make it an inadvertent mistake - penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - additions/ disallowances made under normal provisions of the Act, if ultimately the tax liability is determined u/s 115JB - No penalty

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has accepted the additions made in the assessment does not by itself justify the imposition of penalty for concealment - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when we examine penalty levied on account of salary disallowance AO has merely made adhoc addition by way of guess work and the AO has not...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

Quick Updates: