Profiteering - restaurant services - food stuff - the quantum of ...

GST

February 6, 2019

Profiteering - restaurant services - food stuff - the quantum of denial of such benefit or the profiteered amount illegally earned by the Respondent is determined as ₹ 41,42,97,635/- as per the provisions of Rule 133 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - restaurant services - food stuff - the quantum of ...

GST

February 6, 2019

You may also like:

Profiteering - restaurant service - benefit of reduction of tax from 18% to 5% not passed to customers - applicant could not establish profiteering for want of credible evidence

Profiteering - supply of restaurant service - The Respondent was legally not required to collect the excess GST and therefore, he has not only violated the provisions of...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - Respondent directed to refund / repay both the profiteered amount @2.61% of the taxable amount (base price) and the GST on the said...

Profiteering - restaurant service - the Respondent had increased the base prices of different items by more than 11.16% i.e. by more than what was required to offset the...

Anti-Profiteering - benefit of reduction in the rate of GST in restaurant service - purchase of 6 Hara Bhara Kabab Sub - base price of the product increased from ₹...

Profiteering - restaurant service - reduction in the GST rate not passed - The profiteered amount is determined as ₹ 78,41,754/- as has been computed in...

Profiteering - purchased a flat in the Respondent's project - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of...

Profiteering - reduction of rate of tax - The restaurant has failed to pass on both the above benefits to his customers - The amount is inclusive of the extra GST which...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - it is alleged that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - restaurant service - Respondent had increased the base prices of different items by more than 9.05% i.e. by more than what was required to offset the...

Quick Updates: