Eligibility to deduction u/s 35D to the Bank - High Court should ...

Income Tax

March 18, 2019

Eligibility to deduction u/s 35D to the Bank - High Court should have frame substantial question of law before hearing appeal bipartite - issue remanded to High Court for consideration the substantial question of law that whether the respondent Bank is an industrial undertaking so as to entitle them to claim deduction u/s 35D.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Eligibility to deduction u/s 35D to the Bank - High Court should ...

Income Tax

March 18, 2019

You may also like:

Entitlement to deduction u/s 10B - it is trite law that accounting entries are not decisive in determining the question of eligibility for a claim of deduction or exemption - AT

Deduction u/s 35D - the assessee had increased the share capital by way of private placement with its holding, hence, deduction u/s 35D not allowable to the assessee - AT

Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain...

Hearing of appeal by High Court - appeal heard on merit without framing questions, on the basis of questions of law raised in appeal - The appeals are remanded to the...

Direction in original appellate proceeding - Not challenged - it cannot now question the findings of the lower appellate authority based on earlier direction - No...

Deduction u/s 35D - "premium" collected by the appellant-Company on its subscribed share capital cannot be treated “capital employed in the business of the Company" -...

Addition u/s 68 - substantial question of law - The Supreme court has held that, the jurisdiction of the High Court to interfere with the orders passed by the Courts...

Correct head of income - the nature of gains from mutual fund redemptions - these gains were capital gains, not business income - no substantial question of law arises - HC

Allowabiltry of depreciation - not claimed deprecation in either its original return or in its revised return - Tribunal allowed the depreciation - no substantial...

Clandestine removal - surplus stock of angles, channel and joist - non-acceptance of appellant's explanation does not raise any substantial question of law

Quick Updates: