The appellant could have entertained bonafide belief that they ...

CENVAT Credit Case: No Evidence of Intent to Evade Tax, Extended Limitation Period Not Applicable.

March 25, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax AT

The appellant could have entertained bonafide belief that they are eligible for CENVAT Credit on the dumpers and tippers - also there is nothing in the record to indicate that there was suppression, misstatement of fact with intent to evade tax - Extended period of limitation cannot be invoked.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The appellant could have entertained bonafide belief that they ...

CENVAT Credit Case: No Evidence of Intent to Evade Tax, Extended Limitation Period Not Applicable.

March 25, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Demand of service tax - Extended period of limitation - In place of invoking extended period in cases of suppression of fact with an intent to evade payment of duty or...

The appellant wrongly availed Cenvat credit on input services for unsold flats after issuance of completion certificate, contravening Rules 6(3) and 6(3A) of the Cenvat...

Extended period of limitation - It is clear that even when an assessee has suppressed facts, the extended period of limitation can be invoked only when “suppression’ is...

The key points are: Appropriation of Rs. 11,00,000 deposited under protest during investigation cannot be considered as acceptance of liability. The extended period of...

CESTAT ruled that extended limitation period under Section 73(1) of Finance Act was not applicable as appellant disclosed Cenvat credit in ST3 returns, showing no...

Extended period of limitation of five years: Mere non-disclosure of receipts in the service tax return does not automatically mean there was an intent to evade payment...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - damage of raw material - demand invoking extended period of limitation confirmed - HC

Issue of invoking an extended period of limitation for service tax assessment in cases involving interpretation of legal provisions. It establishes that mere...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 - The CESTAT held that, No evidence of positive act of suppression to evade payment of duty. Extended period cannot be invoked without evidence of...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed issues regarding the invocation of the extended period of limitation due to suppression of facts leading to denial of CENVAT...

Invocation of extended period of limitation - The Principal Commissioner, therefore, fell in error in observing that the extended period of limitation could be invoked...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - Banking and other Financial Services - once there is an excess payment, malafide intention that too of tax evasion cannot be alleged qua the...

The CESTAT held that the demand of Rs.80,61,111/- (including Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess) raised on the ground of difference between the...

Appellant filed bill of entry correctly declaring imported goods as Composite Long Rod Insulators on 9-2-2017. Issue involved interpretation of 'composite' and 'polymer'...

Eligibility to CENVAT Credit - Invocation of extended period of limitation - when the issue of eligibility of credit was in dispute during the impugned period, the...

Quick Updates: