Penalty u/s 77 and 78 of FA - service tax on Manpower ...

Penalty Removed Due to Confusion Over Service Tax Liability on Individuals Under Finance Act Sections 77 & 78.

March 28, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Penalty u/s 77 and 78 of FA - service tax on Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service by individual - relevant period confusion as to whether the individual person or only a commercial concern is liable to pay service tax is reasonable cause for deleting penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 77 and 78 of FA - service tax on Manpower ...

Penalty Removed Due to Confusion Over Service Tax Liability on Individuals Under Finance Act Sections 77 & 78.

March 28, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding service tax liability on GTA services during 2008-2013. The Tribunal determined service tax liability shifted to service...

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the...

Waiver of penalty u/s 77 & 78 - during the period service tax liability under reverse charge mechanism was being disputed - penalty dropped - AT

The case pertains to the levy of service tax under the reverse charge mechanism (RCM) on rental payments made by a company to its directors for renting immovable...

Levy of penalties u/s 77 and 78 - Bonafide belief - assessee had in fact recovered Service Tax periodically from the service recipient. Not only that such service tax...

CESTAT held that an Amway distributor is liable for service tax on commission received from sales group performance, categorizing it as Business Auxiliary Service. The...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Demand of service tax from the Sub-contractor - Demand of service tax with interest confirmed - Levy of penalty u/s 77 & 78 waived invoking the provisions of section 80- AT

CESTAT ruled that service tax demands for rent-a-cab, tour operator, and business auxiliary services cannot be extended beyond normal limitation period due to absence of...

The Service Tax liability on ‘Management Consultancy Services' was in nascent stage when the Audit Party brought to the knowledge of appellant that Service Tax liability...

Adjustment of advance of service tax was paid but had not been shown in the ST-3 Return as advances and not been adjusted subsequently - Under Rule 6 of the Service Tax...

Penalty under Sections 77 and 78 - delayed payment of service tax - The statutory levies cannot be obviated for so long merely because the computer was down - levy of...

Penalty u/s 76, 77, and 78 - service tax with interest deposited before issuance of show cause notice - import of services - Stay granted - AT

Quick Updates: