Classification of Precipitated Chalk - whether classifiable and ...

Precipitated Chalk Duty Dispute: Charged 16% Under Chapter 28 or Nil Under Chapter 25; Demand Set Aside for Limitation.

March 30, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Classification of Precipitated Chalk - whether classifiable and chargeable to duty @ 16% under chapter 28 (Inorganic Chemicals) or under Chapter 25 (Mineral Products) attracting nil rate of duty? - Demand set aside on the ground of period of limitation.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Classification of Precipitated Chalk - whether classifiable and ...

Precipitated Chalk Duty Dispute: Charged 16% Under Chapter 28 or Nil Under Chapter 25; Demand Set Aside for Limitation.

March 30, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Goods classified as 'Zero Air' cleared by appellant from December 2002 to June 2007 were classifiable under Chapter Heading 2804 attracting 16% duty, not under Chapter...

Classification of the product ‘Di Calcium Phosphate - Animal Feed Grade - chapter 23 or chapter 28 - prima facie, the product would fall under Chapter 28 and liable to duty - AT

Clandestine removal - aluminium circles - it is found that Revenue has taken contrary stand wherein in the first show cause notice it is admitted that assessee has...

Levy of redemption fine and penalty - provisional release of goods - the appellant paid entire amount of the differential duty along with interest thereon and 15% duty...

Duty demand u/s 28(1) of Customs Act, 1962, upon importer and transferee of license issued by DGFT - Liability of transferee for fraudulently obtained license - Levy of...

Classification of Natural Marble / Granite – Chapter 25 OR Chapter 68 – If the classification of polished marbles is under Chapter 25, Granite slabs undergone the same...

Extended Period of limitation u/s 28 - Demand duty - confiscation - penalty - ab initio cancellation of the scrip - Forged Shipping Bills - The CESTAT held that the...

Duty Demand u/s 28 raised after 14 years – the show cause notice demanding duty was hopelessly time-barred and consequently the confirmation of duty demand along with...

Misdeclaration of imported polished marble slabs as unpolished slabs. Excess quantity found during physical verification. Customs duty demanded along with interest and...

Valuation - third party inspection charges cannot be included in transaction value - Supreme Court held cost of transportation from place of removal to delivery excluded...

Liability to pay customs duty when confiscated goods are redeemed after payment of fine u/s 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 includes liability to pay interest on delayed...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - the object of both the provisions is clear and the only difference is that Chapter X uses the word “remission” of duty on excisable goods”...

Duty demand u/s 28 - appellant was fully aware that the repair activity undertaken by it did not amount to manufacture and therefore the goods used for repair of CPTs...

The High Court held that u/ss 28AA(1) and 28(10) of the Customs Act, there is no requirement for a demand for interest to be made in the original assessment order....

Quick Updates: