Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2019 Year 2019 This

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - partnership firm is not liable ...

Income Tax

April 10, 2019

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - partnership firm is not liable to justify the source of fund in the hands of the partner - if the AO is not convinced about the creditworthiness of the partner, the inquiry had to be made at the end of the partner and not against the firm

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credit - capital contribution in cash by the partners - While deleting the additions, the Tribunal held that, if the Ld. AO was not...

  2. Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - cash received from partners - difference pointed out by the AO as capital introduced by both the partners of the assessee firm different...

  3. Additions u/s 68 - Unsecured loans - partnership firm - Making addition of unsecured loans relating to the partnership firm in the hands of the assessee is bad in law...

  4. Additions u/s 68 - unsecured loans - unexplained cash credit - proof of source of source or origin of the cash credits – Very genuineness of the transaction was not...

  5. Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained cash credit - CIT(A) accepted the source of cash deposits without any supporting documents, the issue require detailed enquiry with regard...

  6. Addition u/s 68 on unexplained capital - erroneous filing of ITR and is a result of mistake committed by the assessee partnership firm - the capital introduced by the...

  7. Addition u/s 68 - Cash loan and interest income earned on such cash loan unexplained - It is not understandable as how the cash loan are unexplained, when the AO has not...

  8. Addition u/s 68 - availability of source and application of fund - Cash in hand - AO ought to have made cash flow statement with opening cash balance, deposit and...

  9. Penalty u/s 112 - since penalty has been imposed on partnership firm under Section 112 (a), separate penalty on its partner would not be justified - AT

  10. Tribunal was justified in holding that no separate penalties were warranted on the partners in addition to the penalty on the partnership firm - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates