Valuation - the distributor sold the medicines to DMER at higher ...

Central Excise

May 1, 2019

Valuation - the distributor sold the medicines to DMER at higher transaction value. The question of normal price u/s 4 as it stood prior to 2000 does not apply when there is a transaction value.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation - the distributor sold the medicines to DMER at higher ...

Central Excise

May 1, 2019

You may also like:

Valuation - manufacture and clearance of physician samples - sale on principal to principal basis - whatever goods were sold by the appellant to their principal is...

Method of Valuation - section 4 (on the transaction value) or under section 4A (on the RSP minus abatement)? - bulbs sold by the appellant to EESL - How can a retail...

Valuation - discount given on the Demo cars disallowed - value of the demo cars to be determined as per the price of normal cars cleared to the dealers - AT

Valuation of imported goods - Transaction Price - Grant of territorial commission/discount cannot be arbitrary/or discriminatory - It does not affect the normal trade...

Valuation under central excise - sales were taking place at the distributor’s premises and, therefore, the distributor’s commission and freight expenses upto the...

Valuation - physician samples - in the absence of any allegation of price at which the samples were being sold by the assessee to the distributor, the value of said...

Valuation of Goods – Transaction value u/s 4 or MRP based valuation u/s 4A - Bulk pack of the Tooth Brushes – cannot be considered as for retail sale - stay granted - AT

Transaction value based valuation or MRP based valuation - Section 4 or section 4A - Supply of mango avakai pickles to M/s Nestle - AT

Valuation - sale through depot - Once the normal transaction value of the impugned goods sold from other place at or about the same time is ascertainable, there is no...

Valuation - The rejection of transaction value only on the basis of the prices circulated by the Directorate of Valuation/NIDB data, is not correct - AT

Quick Updates: