Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2019 Year 2019 This

Assessment order - effect of order, prospective or retrospective? ...


Maharashtra Tribunal Decision: Original Tax Liabilities Stand, No Reopening of Past Transactions from 2006 Assessment Order.

May 7, 2019

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Assessment order - effect of order, prospective or retrospective? - Merely because the order of 11th September, 2006 is set aside by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal by its judgment and order dated 20th January, 2015, the transactions covered and dealt with by that judgment, which gave rise to a tax liability, cannot now be reopened.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CESTAT adjudicated a service tax dispute involving multiple service providers. The tribunal partially allowed the appellant's appeal, exempting services provided to...

  2. Eligibility to make adjustment of excess service tax paid against future service tax liability - Claim of Excess service tax paid due to issuance of revised invoice -...

  3. Levy of service tax on rebate/subsidy received from Suzuki Japan - Referring to past Tribunal orders and legal principles, the Tribunal found that the Department cannot...

  4. The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

  5. Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

  6. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  7. Refund - wherever the appellant have deposited the service tax, the same has been against the past liability. Such payment is made by the appellant, on being informed...

  8. Power of Tribunal to enhance the tax liability - The Tribunal is an independent adjudicatory authority having jurisdiction to determine the liability to pay tax. Under...

  9. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding foreign tax credit for state taxes paid in the United States under Section 91, despite the existence of an India-USA...

  10. The Appellate Tribunal examined the classification of services provided by the appellant to overseas educational institutions, determining whether they constituted...

  11. Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

  12. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment solely based on the information from a survey conducted by the Sales Tax Department, without independently examining...

  13. CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding service tax liability on GTA services during 2008-2013. The Tribunal determined service tax liability shifted to service...

  14. The case pertains to the validity of reopening of assessment by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the characterization of short-term capital gains (STCG) from the sale of...

  15. The High Court held that for a works contract involving construction of a barrage across two states, Telangana and Maharashtra, the place of supply would be determined...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates