Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2019 Year 2019 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - genuineness of the claim has neither ...

Income Tax

June 5, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - genuineness of the claim has neither been disputed by the department nor the claimed expenses are false - the assessee has furnished all the relevant facts concerning the claim made by it in the return filed and disallowance u/s.40(a) was made for the reasons that assessee failed to deduct TDS thereon - no penalty

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - credit worthiness and genuineness of the transaction - Gifts by family friends – the explanation given by the assessee is totally false -...

  2. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

  3. Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

  4. Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - penalty cannot be levied where a bonafide claim of the assessee was rejected by the tax department. - AT

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the claim of the assessee was found to be false claim and explanations offered by the assessee were found by the Revenue to be false and clearly...

  6. Penalty under section 271(1) (c) - the cost of construction in the immovable property was found to be a false claim - where the claim of the assessee was found to be...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - provision for leave encashment - dispute was only relating to the year in which the said expenses are allowable and not about the very...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Wrongful claim of depreciation - The attempts made by the assessee are indicative of frivolous nature of claim - penalty confirmed - AT

  10. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction claimed u/s 80IA - there being no factual basis for establishing that the expenses needed to be allocated and the expenses so...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates