Stay petition - directed to the (Respondent) appellate authority ...

Court Orders Appellate Authority to Evaluate Petitioner's Hardship Over 20% Tax Demand Payment Under Instruction No.4(B)(b) 2016.

June 11, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Stay petition - directed to the (Respondent) appellate authority to consider the genuine hardship that would be caused to the petitioner in case the he is directed to pay 20% of the disputed demand placing reliance on Instruction No.4(B)(b) of the Circular dated 29.2.2016 - protected from coercive action till a decision is taken by AA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Stay petition - directed to the (Respondent) appellate authority ...

Court Orders Appellate Authority to Evaluate Petitioner's Hardship Over 20% Tax Demand Payment Under Instruction No.4(B)(b) 2016.

June 11, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Stay of demand - payment of 20% of the outstanding demand - ITAT rejecting its application for stay on the recovery of demand during the pendency of appeal - The Delhi...

Seeking service tax refund for payment of VAT liability - he petitioner had made the payment of the service tax for the periods in question voluntarily and had never...

Dishonour of Cheque - requirement to deposit a minimum of 20% of the fine or compensation - speedy disposal of cases - The High Court found that the appellate court...

HC accepted petitioner's alternative proposal to pay additional 5% of outstanding tax demand for AY 2011-12, bringing total payment to 20% of assessed amount. This...

HC rejected Petitioner's application for unconditional tax demand stay, affirming the requirement to deposit 20% of the contested tax amount. The court found the deposit...

Petitioner availed alternate remedy of filing substantive appeal against assessment order and notices issued u/ss 148A and 148 of the Act. Court held that if assessment...

Tax authority rejected rectification application filed by taxpayer for zero-rated supply citing violation of principles of natural justice. Court examined impugned...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

HC granted partial relief to state-owned corporation, staying impugned tax order contingent on depositing Rs. 30 crore within three weeks. The court considered the...

The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

HC set aside the order requiring mandatory 20% deposit of disputed tax demand as precondition for stay application hearing. The court found this requirement violated...

The High Court reviewed a challenge to an assessment order, focusing on the violation of natural justice principles and the issue of input tax credit entitlement due to...

Refund of adjustments made in excess of 20% of the disputed tax demands - s per mandate of law as well as the fact that refunds have been adjusted against outstanding...

The High Court reviewed a challenge to an interim order requiring appellants to deposit 20% of the remaining unpaid interest within a specified timeframe. The court held...

Quick Updates: